🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 743+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.8 out of 5 (743 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26.53
$44.22
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Skull Sword Pendant Sterling Silver 925 L 1.21 x W 0.18 x H 3.33 0.4 Oz

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt delivery
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz

Skull Sword Pendant
Sterling Silver 925
L 1.21" x W 0.18" x H 3.33"
0.4 Oz

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 868707

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Pendants

Original Price: $44.22 USD

Sale Price: $26.53 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2259 reviews
AC
Amber Carter βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
marvelous product
The Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz is straightforward to understand.
32 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
ideal for my needs
From my experience, it works as described so it’s acceptable. Arrived on time.
7 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright
9 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really happy
After a few use, the Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz feels solid and I’m satisfied.
20 people found this helpful
HP​
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Philadelphia, PA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific investment
Packaging was fine.
34 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Houston, TX

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb quality
The Skull Sword Sterling Silver .925 0.4 Oz is smaller than I expected, but still usable.
3 people found this helpful