๐Ÿšš gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 729+ reviews
Outdoor โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.1 out of 5 (729 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$26
$43.33
Sale
โœ“ no-cost delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

This price is for both of them

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt delivery
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside

This price is for both of them

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Outdoor products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1015327

Category: Outdoor > Watering Equipment > Rain Barrels

Original Price: $43.33 USD

Sale Price: $26 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3514 reviews
MK
Megan King
4 months ago ยท brand-new York, NY
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Really superb
I didnโ€™t notice any defects on the Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside.
8 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Orlando, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
So happy with this
The Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside feels reasonably well made.
10 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Cincinnati, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Highly satisfied
The Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside feels powerful and reliable.
22 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson โœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago ยท Columbus, OH
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Worth every penny
In daily use, it feels okay and it works for me.
35 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Milwaukee, WI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
No complaints
After a few days, the Two vintage beaded red sconce with candle inside performs as expected which is good enough. Works fine so far.
16 people found this helpful