🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 364+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

1978 vintage Garfield mug

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5 (364 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$8.55
$14.25
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

fabulous condition. Enesco brand. Christmas theme.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt distribution
↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

1978 vintage Garfield mug

fabulous condition. Enesco brand. Christmas theme.

This product is faultless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1773326

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Mugs

Original Price: $14.25 USD

Sale Price: $8.55 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 4706 reviews
MW​
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Tulsa, OK
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant 1978 vintage Garfield mug
In daily use, the 1978 vintage Garfield mug fits my needs and it’s fine overall.
10 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Miami, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
really satisfied
In daily use, the 1978 vintage Garfield mug feels solid so no complaints. Nothing fancy.
3 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Brilliant 1978 vintage Garfield mug
So far, the 1978 vintage Garfield mug works as described and I don’t regret it.
49 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· recent York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
delightful product​
plain and effective 1978 vintage Garfield mug.
5 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Charlotte, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Absolutely flawless
The 1978 vintage Garfield mug arrived safely and quickly.
44 people found this helpful