🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 202+ reviews
Toys ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller 

Charlie Brown vintage record book

★★★★★4.1 out of 5 (202 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$15
$25
Sale
✓ no-cost delivery on this item • Limited time offer

1978 vintage “You’re in fancy Charlie Brown” record book by Charles M Schultz

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt distribution
↩️
handy Returns

📋 Product Description

Charlie Brown vintage record book

1978 vintage “You’re in treasure Charlie Brown” record book by Charles M Schultz

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 1816982

Category: Toys > Vintage & Antique Toys > Electronics

Original Price: $25 USD

Sale Price: $15 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.1
★★★★★
Based on 7426 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Columbus, OH
★★★★★
Outstanding!
Personally, the Charlie Brown vintage record book works as described and it meets expectations. Packaging was plain.
48 people found this helpful
AC
Amber Carter ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Albuquerque, NM
★★★★★
Absolutely ideal
From my experience, the Charlie Brown vintage record book is practical so I’m okay with it.
11 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts ✓ Verified Purchase 
1 month ago · Fort Worth, TX
★★★★★
incredibly happy
Personally, the Charlie Brown vintage record book fits my needs so no complaints.
10 people found this helpful

BT
Brittany Turner ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Houston, TX
★★★★★
splendid Charlie Brown vintage record book!
Quality is decent for the price. Charlie Brown vintage record book is fine.
36 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
1 month ago · Tucson, AZ
★★★★★
Simply fantastic
the Charlie Brown vintage record book is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.
8 people found this helpful