🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 906+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

swimming trunks

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5 (906 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$43
$71.67
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Scotch & Soda Mens swimming shorts, iconic look, vintage look, retro patterns, size L

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt distribution

↩️
handy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

swimming trunks

Scotch & Soda Mens swimming shorts, traditional look, vintage look, retro patterns, size L

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1820768

Category: Vintage > Clothing > Swimwear

Original Price: $71.67 USD

Sale Price: $43 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 3927 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkably pleased
From my experience, the swimming trunks feels solid and I’m satisfied. Works fine so far.​
20 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
cherish this swimming trunks!
Honestly, the swimming trunks works as described and it’s fine overall.
38 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Jacksonville, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless swimming trunks
shipment was normal. The swimming trunks arrived safe.
37 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
Honestly, the swimming trunks does its job so no complaints.
41 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Couldn't be happier
The swimming trunks is smaller than I expected, but still usable.
37 people found this helpful