🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 658+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Vintage Union Bay Cargo Shorts ( 34 Waist )

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5 (658 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$12
$20
Sale
βœ“ no-cost delivery on this item β€’ Limited time offer

#cargo #vintage #summer

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
prompt delivery
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Union Bay Cargo Shorts ( 34 Waist )

#cargo #vintage #summer

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2248211

Category: Men > Shorts > Other

Original Price: $20 USD

Sale Price: $12 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ on the house fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 5014 reviews
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Nashville, TN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
Happy with how this Vintage Union Bay Cargo Shorts ( 34 Waist ) works.
42 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson
1 month ago Β· recent York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
remarkable Vintage Union Bay Cargo Shorts ( 34 Waist )
To be fair, it works well enough and it meets expectations. Packaging was basic.
14 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid quality
To be fair, it performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Works fine so far.
27 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Worth every penny
The Vintage Union Bay Cargo Shorts ( 34 Waist ) feels well made.
48 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate this Vintage Union Bay Cargo Shorts ( 34 Waist )!
So far, the Vintage Union Bay Cargo Shorts ( 34 Waist ) fits my needs which is good enough. Works fine so far.
7 people found this helpful