๐Ÿšš gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.1/5 from 319+ reviews
Vintage โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller 

Gravity Eyewear 9702 Matte Black Eyeglasses

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.1 out of 5 (319 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$32
$53.33
Sale
โœ“ no-cost delivery on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Item appears brand-new unused. Sold as pictured.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
prompt distribution
โ†ฉ๏ธ
handy Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Gravity Eyewear 9702 Matte Black Eyeglasses

Item appears recent unused. Sold as pictured.

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 2363201

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Eyewear

Original Price: $53.33 USD

Sale Price: $32 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ no-cost delivery on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.1
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 2614 reviews
AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Virginia Beach, VA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
merely what I wanted
Smooth operation on this Gravity Eyewear 9702 Matte Black Eyeglasses.
15 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Boston, MA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
No complaints
Nice finish and quality Gravity Eyewear 9702 Matte Black Eyeglasses.
34 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia
4 months ago ยท Colorado Springs, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
faultless purchase
To be fair, it performs as expected which is good enough.
20 people found this helpful
LN
Lauren Nelson โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Minneapolis, MN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Exceptional quality
really good Gravity Eyewear 9702 Matte Black Eyeglasses overall.
15 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Charlotte, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
purely what I wanted
To be fair, the Gravity Eyewear 9702 Matte Black Eyeglasses feels solid and Iโ€™m satisfied.
12 people found this helpful